Personal Finance Info

This blog will contain information about personal financial planning items of interest to CPA advisors and others. It also has information on Israel, public affairs, culture and other things I care about.

Name:
Location: United States

I live with my husband and our spoiled dogs—an English Springer Spaniel, Sasha and an English Setter, Alley in Westfield, NJ.

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Stuffed Cabbage Recipe

For meat mixture, combine:2 lbs. chopped meat2 beaten eggs1/2 pkg. onion soup mix1 c. cooked ricepinches of garlic, paprika, pepper

Once you have prepared the meat, put whole head of green cabbage stalk down in a large pot of boiling water for ten minutes. Remove from pot, but do not discard boiled water.

Throw out outer leaves.

Peel off large leaves, soak briefly in boiled water, and then rinse with cold tap water.

Fold up heaping teaspoonfuls of the meat mixture envelope style into the leaves.

Boil in a broth of 3 cans of tomato sauce, 1 c. brown sugar, 1/2 c. raisins for 1-1 1/2 hrs.

Lowery Defends His Criticism of Bush at Coretta King Funeral

Dr. Joseph Lowery say..."We know now there were no weapons of mass destruction over there. But Coretta knew and we knew that there are weapons of misdirection right down here. Millions without health insurance. Poverty abounds. For war, billions more-- but no more for the poor,"..... It was a rousing address, Dr. Joseph Lowery injected a bit of current politics into the funeral for Coretta Scott King. Addressing her long-time opposition to war.

see the video...

Stoking anger about the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, former President Carter said, "The struggle for equal rights is not over. We only have to recall the color of the faces of those in Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi, those who were most devastated by Katrina, to know that there are not yet equal opportunities for all Americans."

The crowd roared its approval.

And in a reference to President Bush's much-criticized NSA surveillance program, Carter brought up the "secret government wiretapping" of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. many years ago.

Many in the crowd stood to applaud Carter.

Malka Drucker: An Overview of Torah

this site is useful should it be necessary to summarize Torah lessons...

what follows is the one Bob had to write on the portion of the week

Here goes: Last shabbos’ torah portion was certainly one of the first examples in the Torah of Jewish giving and allocations. Our parsha, Terumah, starts off with the collection of donations for construction of the Holy Tabernacle.

I think in many ways this serves as a guide for our fundraising at Federation.

The instructions are very specific:

The Lord spoke to Moses saying: "Speak to the children of Israel, and have them take for Me an offering; from every person whose heart inspires him to generosity, you shall take My offering. And this is the offering that you shall take from them: gold, silver, and copper; blue, purple, and crimson wool; linen and goat hair; ram skins dyed red, tachash skins, and acacia wood; oil for lighting, spices for the anointing oil and for the incense; shoham stones and filling stones for the ephod and for the choshen. And they shall make Me a sanctuary and I will dwell in their midst.”

Heb. ךְתְּרוּמָה, means separation. “They shall set apart from their property an offering for Me. They shall give at a level “whose heart inspires him to generosity”.

Our Rabbis said: The word ךְתְּרוּמָה is mentioned three times representing three offerings.

Rashi elaborates that the Children of Israel were actually commanded to offer three distinct offerings. One was to pay for the ongoing functioning of the Altar for the communal sacrifices. A second offering was used to construct the Tabernacle and its vessels. A third offering was earmarked to cover the costs of the metal sockets in which the boards forming the walls of the Mishkan were placed.

There was no special collection for the Ark, for the Menorah or for the Table. Funding for these items came from the "General Fund," even though we would consider these items far more "glamorous" than the sockets. Why was there only a special fund for the "lowly sockets" and not the other components of the Mishkan?

I saw an insight from Rav Elyakim Schlessinger on this question. He suggests that the Torah is hinting that the sockets have a significance that the other items of the Mishkan do not have. The sockets represent the foundation of the building. Foundations must always be done just right and this required a special collection and contribution for the foundation. No building is stronger than its foundation. The foundation may not be glamorous or something people admire when entering the building, but it is critical. Everything rests upon it.

I think it is clear that the entire Jewish community must rest on a quality foundation.

The commentators said, “Nevertheless, a person who consecrates an article as charity is permitted to write his name upon it, so that it will serve as a memorial for him. It is fitting to do so’.

The foundations were built by the half shekels and the other special items of designated giving required fundraising too! Three separations are mentioned. The sockets were the only structural gift from equal per capita gifts. Other gifts were also required for ongoing maintenance of the altar.

We learned another lesson here too-
There was also a reference to the quality of gifts- A Jew that scrapes together his money and donates with much love and much self-sacrifice may be donating a gift that at face value is worth a fraction of the value of others but his gift may very well be more valuable.

Value is determined by a totally different standard. G-d has a standard regarding how an item is given, which is why the gift of the poor Jew given with enthusiasm surpasses the gifts of the Prince’s given lazily. G-d has a sanctity standard, which is why the poor man’s simpler gift may be worth more than even the Jewels worn as part of the priestly garments.

R' Dovid Krohnglass zt"- said regarding Hashem's request that we build Him a Sanctuary. –
Hashem has no need for our donations, He considers it as if we have put out the money for Him. As such, we become His lenders, and we will be repaid. This deal may be considered to be lopsided in our favor. It is perhaps in this sense that the Midrash exclaims that by donating towards the Mishkan it's good to know that by giving generously to worthy causes we become partners with Hashem, and in so doing, we stand to be repaid in ways we may never had dreamed.

I surmised that G-d was giving us a special opportunity.

As guidance to us in our Federation role-- Krohnglass went on to point out that: A person who influences others and prevails upon them to give tzedakah receives a greater reward than the giver. "The work of tzedakah is peace." [Daniel 12:3]: "And those who motivate the many to righteousness shall be as the stars" applies to the managers of charitable funds and those who collect tzedakah.

Stingy Stones avoid tax on £240m fortune | the Daily Mail

some great tax planning -- paying 1.6 per cent tax on earnings of £242million over the past 20 years... keep rocking!

The Remarrying Kind - New York Times

Ellen Barkin will get $20 million when the divorce to Ron Perelman happens.. As the fourth wife he has already paid 118 million to his fomer wives... according to the NY Times.

Article quotes Harriet Newman Cohen, a New York divorce lawyer, who says marriage, more than dating, fills old traditions of respectability, status and comfort. It might even be love, for a while. Plus, they can afford it.

From the NY Times (Jan 29, 2006)

FOR Ronald O. Perelman, Forbes magazine's 34th-richest man in America, marriage would seem to be getting expensive: last week, he announced that he was divorcing his fourth wife, the actress Ellen Barkin, and would pay out the $20 million promised in their prenuptial pact — having paid $8 million, $80 million and $30 million, respectively, to Wives 1, 2 and 3.

While matchmakers among the ultrarich are already speculating about who will be wife No. 5, others might reasonably ask why Mr. Perelman and other serial grooms in his jet set don't take the actor George Clooney's "never again" approach: Date ferociously, but don't marry. As one prominent New York divorce lawyer said of an 85-year-old client now negotiating his fourth prenup, "Don't you think he would stop?"
"They marry people who listen to completely different music, who don't know who Joe McCarthy was," bemoaned the lawyer, who would not be quoted by name for fear of angering his clients. "They have less chance with every one that it's going to succeed."

So why do the ultrarich marry, and re-marry, and re-marry? For men who have cycled through what Harriet Newman Cohen, a New York divorce lawyer, called "very high powered, high ZIP code divorces," marriage, more than dating, fills old traditions of respectability, status and comfort. It might even be love, for a while. Plus, they can afford it.

Nationwide, the number of people living together instead of marrying has risen strikingly in the last 30 years, just as the percentage of married couples has declined. "The poorer people I've interviewed talk about waiting until they reach a certain economic status to get married," said Pamela Smock, a sociology professor at the University of Michigan who studies marriage, cohabitation and divorce. "They want the house and the picket fence and two cars; they're not going to get married until they get there, and a lot never will."

But for the ultrarich, things are different. People in Mr. Perelman's position, she said, "can get there over and over and over again."
Marriage and money have had a long courtship. But historically, men gained money, not lost it, when they remarried.

"From the Middle Ages through the 16th century, marriage was the main way that upper-class families consolidated wealth," said Stephanie Coontz, the author of "Marriage: A History." "They effected business mergers, made trading alliances, and the really upper classes made peace treaties — it was, 'I'm going to leave this woman now because I have a chance with the daughter of the king of Spain.' "

Only in the last 100 years has love been romanticized.

"This is a new phenomenon — not the mercenary quality, but the fact that people are willing to risk this kind of money, just to say they're married," Ms. Coontz said. "Love has been so idealized that at the top, the rich are willing to throw good money after bad to see if they can get the magic ring." So if a second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience, as Samuel Johnson observed, that's only more true of Marriages 3, 4 and 5.

"They love the institution, they want to do it again," said Janis Spindel, a matchmaker in New York who said she charges $100,000 for what she calls her "power elite clients" to find a spouse. "They think three times is the charm."
Of course, marriage to a certain kind of woman — a movie star, a socialite — can also be about conquest, ambition, cachet.

"It's ego," said David Patrick Columbia, who writes NewYorkSocialDiary.com. "If you're a big deal, you've got to have ways of showing it. You've got the house, got the car, got the wife. They don't think much of marriage, they think much of possessing."

They can easily find women to agree — and typically it is the women who are, as divorce lawyers gently call it, "the non-moneyed."
Stanford G. Lotwin, a divorce lawyer in New York, said he tried to warn his serial clients about taking on serial wives.

"We tell these men, you cannot go anywhere without our card in your pocket," he said. "As soon as you have your second date, you have to call, and we'll remind you how expensive this is. He'll say, 'I repeat your name in my sleep, I promise you I'm not doing anything.' " But soon enough, Mr. Lotwin will be pulling out the box of tissues he uses to guide the man's new fiancée through the prenuptial process.
For many of the men, the prenuptial is simply part of the business deal that is marriage. "They see it like a hedge fund," said Ms. Cohen, the divorce lawyer. "Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't."

And it's just this attitude that makes divorce more likely. "They're used to having whatever they want," said Norman Sheresky, a New York divorce lawyer.
And some aren't ready for the ups and downs of a long marriage. "Nobody thinks the sex is going to change, nobody thinks their life is going to change. Well, it changes. Rich people go, 'I can do something about this.' "

They are also presented with many temptations.

"Everyone is throwing themselves at them, no matter what they look like or what their personality is," Mr. Lotwin said.

As for Mr. Perelman, Mr. Columbia reports, "They're lining up for him already."

How do I comfort my sick loved one? - Health - MSNBC.com

Useful information when visiting the sick -- for how to do it, read this.